Prince of Darkness [Blu-ray] [4K UHD]

Prince of Darkness is a strange movie written by Carpenter and combining religion and theoretical quantum physics. It sounds like a contradictory combination but, it works better then you might expect. The story opens with the death of a priest who presided over a small inner city parish. Enter Donald Pleasance as another priest... who's name is never given... who discovers that the deceased priest was part of a secret society within the church called The Brotherhood Of Sleep. And this sect have been protecting a dark secret that may challenge the very core of what we have come to believe both scientifically and religiously. A team of college students, led by Professor Birack (Victor Wong from Big Trouble In Little China) and including Brian Marsh (Jameson Parker) and Catherine Danforth (Lisa Blount), are brought to the parish to investigate a strange cylinder filled with a pulsating green liquid in a locked chamber in the basement, as well as, the scriptures that come with it. They discover that the liquid is a form of the Anti-Christ and it seeks release in order to bring it's father, the Anti-God into our world. And as members of the team start to fall under it's powerful thrall and they all become plagued by the same strange dreams, it's terrifyingly obvious that the remaining team members are in a fight against an ancient evil that their science may not be able to contain.Carpenter delivers a very odd but, effectively creepy film. It's has an atmosphere of dread from the start to the finish and presents a very chilling scenario that there may be things in existence that neither our religion or science may be able to handle. And as these are two things people most put their faith in, it is a disturbing concept. It also presents an interesting idea that Bible prophecies may have actually been warnings sent from the future as the dream effecting all our college science students appears to be exactly that. Carpenter also presents the possibility that certain Bible stories were put in place to cover more disturbing truths as the scientific knowledge to explain or understand the reality of it was not available. Basically we were told things in fable form because the science wasn't there to properly explain it and we weren't advanced enough to understand it. As someone who was born and raised Christian yet has always had an interest in science, I actually have had this thought myself occasionally and it was interesting to see the master filmmaker weave this theory into his plot. Carpenter also uses his low budget well and keeps the story, for the most part contained in the church. Again working with the fear of isolation as a horde of homicidal homeless people keep our besieged team members inside. Gary B. Kibbe provides the atmospheric cinematography and would collaborate with Carpenter on 7 more projects and he gives Prince a very unsettling look yet, rich with color. This is a strange film that may not appeal to everyone, it took me a few years and repeat viewings before I fully appreciated it and it's grown on me since I first saw it in 87 and wasn't quite sold on it then. The film has it's flaws, some of the make-up FX are cheesy and some of the violent death scenes, especially those perpetrated by the army of homeless people surrounding the church, lead by Alice Cooper, seem a little out of place in a film that starts out working in subtlety. But, since it does switch gears and become more of a traditional horror film in it's second half, as the possessed students try to kill or possess the others who are fighting against their former friends to stay alive, so, in the overall scheme they work fine. Some may not have patience for some of the science heavy dialog but, I though Carpenter's script does a good job of giving scientific explanations for some of the more supernatural elements of the religious scripture presented in his story.Regardless of your beliefs, Carpenter poses some interesting questions and the film is really creepy throughout. And adding to the effectiveness is one of Carpenter's spookiest scores to date composed with frequent collaborator Alan Howarth. Overall, Prince Of Darkness is perhaps Carpenter's oddest and most daring film, in some respects but, yet another that wasn't all that well accepted at first and now has gained a following over the years and rightfully so. This flick may not be for everyone and it's mix of science and religion may not work for some but, I think it's an interesting and thoroughly creepy movie that not only presents some well executed traditional horror elements but, poses some interesting questions and theories about what we believe in as well. Also stars another Big Trouble In Little China, Dennis Dun in a fun role as a skeptical student. The film is now available in this beautiful new transfer from Scream Factory!

I first saw John Carpenter's "Prince of Darkness" when it came out in 1987, and I have to admit to walking out of the theater with mixed feelings. After his groundbreaking "Halloween", the competent and suitably creepy "The Fog", the incredible benchmark that was "The Thing", and the lively, unforgettable romp of "Big Trouble In Little China", I felt a little let down, somehow expecting something completely different. It's too bad that because of those expectations, I had completely missed the point.What I didn't appreciate at the time (along with many others, apparently) was that "Prince of Darkness", instead of being a straightforward "good vs. evil" balls-out experience like "The Thing", wasn't so much about high-end visual imagery or action, but rather something altogether different...a harrowing descent into a disquieting, pervasive atmosphere of approaching doom. Not that it didn't have it's fair share of striking visuals (although more economical in scope, because of the smaller budget, and made all the more impressive when one takes that into account), but that was never the point; simply put, this film was for many years an unrecognized and unheralded masterclass in mood and tone, possessing a subtle but powerful overarching sense of impending dread that few other films have been able to match. There are a number of reasons why this film is so effective, in spite of it's faults, and it's easy to forgive those shortcomings for the sake of the overall experience it offers.Other reviewers have covered various points in greater detail so I'll try to keep from being too redundant. First off, a minor note of viewer discretion: the story itself is based around the transposition of traditional western religion with theoretical quantum mechanics to offer up an alternative worldview of the nature and origin of Good and Evil, and while highly original and inventive, it may come across to some viewers as too severe in it's radical re-thinking and therefore requisite departure from traditional belief systems. Your mileage may vary on this, but speaking from a personal perspective I daresay that anyone who has even a nominal upbringing in a Judeo-Christian or Catholic environment could, depending on their tolerance level for this sort of thing, perhaps be challenged, possibly offended...or simply roll their eyes and shake their head in amusement at some of the audacious liberties taken here. You'll know it when you hear it, but in any case there's really nothing more threatening here than what one would find while watching any given episode of "Ancient Aliens" on the History Channel, so anyone who's able to hang with those astro-nerds and their New Age revisionist "history-of-the-universe" shenanigans for the sake of entertainment value shouldn't have any problems.As for the aforementioned shortcomings: In laying the groundwork early on there are some expositional scenes concerning the science and theology where the character dialogue and delivery can at times come across as trying a little too hard to sell the story, and the admittedly complicated reasoning and explanations given may not always appear to gel with complete clarity, or are left purposely ambiguous and incomplete (viewers with short attention spans or an inability or unwillingness to process information may as well go elsewhere). However, given the ambitious and complex scope of the subject matter, trying to hammer out all of the possible intricacies involved or answer every conceivable question would have ruined the pacing and overall flow of the film, so it's hard to find too much fault there. There are a few instances of questionable character behavior, a few scenes that seem to have been included for effect but that don't quite make sense or add anything useful, and one or two questionable details of the story or setting (specifically in regard to the basement of the church where the ancient cylinder is kept) which could have benefitted from either a short additional scene or perhaps an extra line or two of dialogue to give a reason for their presence, because without that consideration they can come across as oversights or mistakes unless the viewer is willing to actively participate by coming up with their own interpretation or explanation. This may all sound like nitpicking but it really isn't...just mentioning the things that are there, but overall they're trifling, with nothing unforgivable or deal-breaking.The cast, with a few notable exceptions, were mostly unknown or little-known actors but whom I found to all be pleasantly suitable in their respective roles. By and large I've always enjoyed the casting in Carpenter's films; he has a knack for procuring competent, professional talent and getting the most out of them. Among the veteran actors participating here are Donald Pleasence ("Halloween"), Victor Wong and Dennis Dun (of "Big Trouble" fame), and a surprisingly solid Jameson Parker from the 80's TV series "Simon & Simon". A quick aside: over the years I have come to particularly appreciate his performance in this film more with each viewing and find myself wondering why he wasn't used in more films. He brings an understated gravitas and stalwart maturity to the role of Brian Marsh, and is one of the two heroic figures in the story. The other, Brian's tragically-fated love interest Catherine Danforth (played with subtle, quiet melancholy by the talented Lisa Blount), becomes with one desperate, selfless act the ultimate catalyst and tipping point of the scales in the seemingly hopeless conflict at the film's climax. Completely by design there's a definite delineation between Brian and Catherine and the rest of the team, and although the character development between them is necessarily abbreviated and mostly by way of inference, over the course of the film I found myself coming to care about these two and what happens to them, and it is this connection which further gives the end of the film a singularly potent, unforgettable gut-punch which will stay with the viewer long after the credits have ended.As far as the visual presentation goes the production design, locations, sets and cinematography are all well-conceived and melded together with optimal consistency and meticulous attention to detail, and it really shows throughout. This is a great looking film, with keen aesthetics that complement the subject matter admirably. The special effects and makeup appear to be almost exclusively practical in nature, with only a smattering of digital effects added in post-production, but this is purely speculation on my part. To go in expecting a top-shelf visual effect extravaganza such as that which was present in "The Thing", well...it isn't here. This film only had one-fifth of the budget as that one to work with, so no dice on that count. What is here on full display, however, is a prime example of making the very most of what you do have to work with and doing it in a way that overcomes budgetary restraints with ingenuity, imagination, craft and technique. I found the visual effects throughout to be unpretentious yet ultimately satisfying and dramatic in the best workmanlike sense, punching well above their weight class without taking over, while also being finely-tailored and in keeping with the overall look and tone of the film. The lighting, camera angles and set pieces are all capably fitted together and executed with a master's flair, and the unorthodox (albeit somewhat risky) technique Carpenter employed to create the mirror scene during the final, climactic confrontation near the end of the film was an inventive stroke of pure genius.As many others have stated, perhaps the single most defining factor contributing to the overall atmosphere of "Prince of Darkness" is the somewhat minimalistic, yet supremely effective score. Written by Carpenter (and later mastered, I believe, with his multi-film collaborator Alan Howarth) while watching the finished film on a tv set (remember those?), the pulsing synthesizer begins at the opening credits and immediately becomes the organic heartbeat of the film, rising and falling and undulating throughout with a life all it's own. For the most part the music is understated, even approaching ambience at times, and is brought to the fore as punctuation only during certain scenes, but this to great effect, and seldom has any soundtrack exuded such a disquieting, profound undercurrent of brooding menace as is on display here. When given free rein as he was on this project, Carpenter is a true auteur in the sense of creating films that are unmistakably his, down to the scoring and sound design, and in this area he excels much more often than not. I believe his most beautiful work (to my ears, at least) was in "Village of the Damned", and the most well-known being the classic, instantly recognizable theme from "Halloween", but I'll contend that the score from "Prince of Darkness" is by far the most fitting and effective of any of his films. In particular, the passage flowing through the final mind-wrenching epilogue into the end credits will chill your bones to the marrow and haunt your dreams.Final Thoughts:When everything is said and done it really all comes down to the storytelling, through either narrative or presentation (hopefully both), and the ability to create and maintain a consistent integrity of characterization, mood and atmosphere that will make or break any film, especially when it comes to suspense and horror. Although having pretty much moved on in my viewing habits as I've gotten older, I have sampled quite a fair number of newer efforts and in doing so have noticed a dramatic shift in the genre, namely that over the years so much in the horror film industry has gone the way of the mean-spirited and ugly; wherein the classic archetype of ordinary people forced by circumstances beyond their control to push back against the darkness has been replaced with a certain all-encompassing, corrosive ambiguity in which quite often there are no longer any clear protagonists and antagonists, and indeed very little discernable difference between good and evil anymore, and old-school storytelling, filmmaking craft and ingenuity have been usurped by little more than alarmingly ubiquitous grotesquery, obscenely graphic portrayals of sadistic cruelty and torture, cheap jump scares, darting figures in the foreground or background, lazy sound design and editing, uninspired and unimaginative directing and lastly, uninformed and derivative storylines populated with shallow and wholly unsympathetic characters who are impossible for the viewer to engage with because writers and filmmakers today either don't know how to invest them with any sense of genuine humanity, or else don't think it's important enough to bother with. To put a fine point to it, the only useful purpose I can find anywhere for the overwhelming majority of this myriad of post-millennial failures is to serve as a contrast and reminder of just how much better many of the older films really were, and still are. So there it is...that's my story and I'm sticking to it.I'll finish up by saying that for whatever it's worth I consider "Prince of Darkness" to be one of the very last genuine accomplishments in horror cinema before everything started to go south just a few short years later, and arguably one of the finest. They simply don't make films like this anymore, and if you're someone who likes the genre and somehow missed out on it, go watch it one dark, stormy evening...you won't be disappointed. If you're one of the many who have seen it, go watch it again...you won't be disappointed either; it holds up remarkably well and is one of the few films that somehow seems to get better with each viewing.